As debt vulnerabilities persist across the continent, African governments are expected to increase reliance on multilateral lenders and focus on sustainable investment strategies in 2026, despite prevailing financial challenges, according to S&P Global Ratings.
African governments are expected to increase reliance on multilateral lenders and press ahead with reforms in 2026 as debt distress remains a prominent risk across the continent, S&P Global Ratings said on Monday.
S&P Global’s head of national ratings and analytics for Africa, Samira Mensah, warned that debt vulnerabilities are widespread. “We have so far, according to the IMF, more than 20 countries facing a high risk of debt distress, or severe vulnerabilities,” she said. According to the International Monetary Fund, countries such as Niger are among those identified as facing high risks and need to sustain macroeconomic discipline and structural reform to secure resilient, inclusive growth.
Despite the elevated risks, international bond markets have reopened for some African issuers. Lower interest costs helped drive roughly $6 billion of eurobond sales from countries including Benin, Kenya and Ivory Coast so far this year, with more issuers expected and a planned maiden sovereign bond by the Democratic Republic of Congo in the pipeline. The rebound highlights investor appetite when yields fall, but S&P cautioned that borrowing in dollars increases sensitivity to external shocks and exchange-rate swings.
S&P Global’s research also pointed to a record year for labelled sustainable debt in Africa, with nearly $13 billion issued in 2024, though that still represents under 1% of global sustainable bond volumes. According to the report, expanding green finance, deepening capital markets and regional integration will be important to channel funding into infrastructure and energy projects that the continent needs.
At the same time, domestic debt dynamics present fresh challenges. S&P’s analysis shows rising interest burdens and shrinking foreign holdings of local-currency debt have left countries such as Kenya and South Africa exposed to tightened global financing conditions and currency pressures. The ratings agency said strengthening domestic capital markets and prudent fiscal policy will be necessary to reduce vulnerabilities.
The agency’s ratings actions last year reflected these mixed forces: seven sovereign upgrades were attributed largely to stronger growth prospects and reform momentum, while negative actions were taken where shocks or policy backsliding weakened credit metrics. S&P highlighted reform progress in Nigeria, which it rates B- with a positive outlook, and noted South Africa’s relative improvement, the country is rated BB with a positive outlook. By contrast, Mozambique sits at CCC+ with a negative outlook, and Senegal is at CCC+ with “credit watch developing”, reflecting concerns it may face default risks.
Infrastructure and energy financing remain central to the debate over how Africa will bridge development gaps. S&P Global’s institutional-strategy work shows large-scale projects in countries such as Egypt are being financed through a mix of bilateral donors, multilateral institutions and government incentives to attract private capital, while another report underlined the continent’s energy shortfall, more than 600 million people lack electricity access, and the need for innovative financing to accelerate electrification and reduce fossil-fuel dependence.
The theme of mobilising capital for sustainable growth featured prominently at the inaugural S&P Global Africa Summit in Johannesburg, co-hosted with the Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa, where policymakers, investors and market insiders discussed ways to bolster financial markets and unlock investment across the region.
S&P said the near-term outlook remains slightly tilted to the negative, driven by concerns in specific cases such as Senegal, Mozambique and Madagascar, but noted pockets of improvement. The ratings agency urged countries to bolster resilience to external shocks, pursue credible reform plans and develop domestic markets to reduce reliance on volatile external financing.
- https://tribune.com.pk/story/2594419/african-nations-turn-to-multilateral-lenders – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/01/22/pr25014-niger-imf-completes-6th-rev-under-ecf-arr-and-2nd-rev-under-rsf-arr-concl-2024-aiv-consl – In January 2025, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) completed the sixth review under Niger’s Extended Credit Facility Arrangement and the second review under the Resilience and Sustainability Facility Arrangement. The IMF noted that over 20 countries, including Niger, faced a high risk of debt distress or severe vulnerabilities. The IMF emphasized the need for Niger to implement sound macroeconomic policies and structural reforms to achieve diversified, sustained, inclusive, and resilient growth.
- https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/special-reports/look-forward/unlocking-africa/sustainable-finance-africa-growth-challenges – S&P Global’s report highlights that sustainable debt volumes in Africa reached nearly $13 billion in 2024, marking a record for the continent. Despite this growth, African sustainable bond issuance constitutes less than 1% of the global total, indicating a significant gap in addressing the continent’s development and infrastructure needs. The report underscores the importance of green finance, stronger capital markets, and regional integration to unlock Africa’s potential for global sustainable growth.
- https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/research/articles/231101-african-domestic-debt-reassessing-vulnerabilities-amid-higher-for-longer-interest-rates-12900489 – S&P Global Ratings’ analysis of African domestic debt reveals that countries like Kenya and South Africa face significant vulnerabilities due to high interest burdens and exposure to external shocks. Kenya’s interest costs have tripled in six years, while South Africa’s foreign holdings of local currency debt have decreased, leading to currency pressures. The report emphasizes the need for these nations to strengthen their domestic capital markets and implement sound fiscal policies to mitigate risks.
- https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/special-reports/look-forward/unlocking-africa/institutional-strategies-infrastructure-success-africa – S&P Global’s report discusses the importance of institutional strategies for infrastructure success in Africa. It highlights that Egypt’s large-scale infrastructure projects are financed through a combination of bilateral donors, multilateral financial institutions, and government incentives to attract private investors. The report also notes geopolitical tensions, such as those between Egypt and Ethiopia over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, and emphasizes the need for conflict-sensitive planning and community engagement to accelerate infrastructure projects.
- https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/special-reports/look-forward/unlocking-africa/africas-energy-transformation-innovative-financing-solutions – S&P Global’s report on Africa’s energy transformation highlights the continent’s challenges in improving electricity access and reducing fossil fuel dependence. It notes that over 600 million people in Africa lack access to electricity, and about 1 billion have no access to clean cooking options. The report emphasizes the need for innovative financing solutions, including green finance and stronger capital markets, to address these challenges and unlock Africa’s potential for sustainable growth.
- https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/events/in-person/sp-global-africa-summit-2025 – S&P Global Ratings, in collaboration with the Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa (BADEA), hosted the inaugural S&P Global Africa Summit in Johannesburg in 2025. The event brought together regional and international leaders, policymakers, and capital markets stakeholders to explore strategies for unlocking investment and advancing Africa’s development agenda through robust financial markets. The summit aimed to provide insights and foster dialogue on the path forward for African capital markets.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
8
Notes:
The article was published on February 25, 2026, and cites a report released last week, indicating recent information. However, the content closely mirrors previous S&P Global Ratings reports from January 2026, suggesting some recycled material. ([spglobal.com](https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/research/2026/01/key-themes-shaping-middle-east-north-africa-20261?utm_source=openai))
Quotes check
Score:
7
Notes:
The direct quotes from Samira Mensah and other figures are not independently verifiable online. While the content aligns with S&P Global Ratings’ known positions, the exact wording cannot be confirmed, raising concerns about the authenticity of the quotes.
Source reliability
Score:
6
Notes:
The article originates from The Express Tribune, a Pakistani publication. While it is a reputable source within Pakistan, its international reach and influence are limited. Additionally, the article heavily relies on information from S&P Global Ratings, which may introduce bias or a lack of independent verification.
Plausibility check
Score:
7
Notes:
The claims about African nations increasing reliance on multilateral lenders and the specific debt ratings of countries like South Africa and Nigeria are plausible and consistent with known economic trends. However, the lack of independent verification and the reliance on a single source reduce the overall credibility.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The article presents information that is plausible and timely but heavily relies on a single source, S&P Global Ratings, without independent verification. The inability to verify direct quotes and the limited reach of the publication further diminish its credibility. Given these concerns, the content cannot be fully trusted without further corroboration.

