Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange-traded funds have recorded their first positive weekly net inflows after two months of withdrawals, signalling tentative investor optimism amidst ongoing geopolitical and macroeconomic uncertainties.
Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum exchange-traded funds have edged back into positive territory, with the week to July 10 marking the first net inflow for both products after two months of persistent withdrawals, according to SoSoValue data. Bitcoin funds attracted $197.40 million, while Ethereum funds took in $84.42 million, lifting total net assets to $77.42 billion and $9.59 billion respectively.
The improvement follows a bruising stretch for the sector. Bitcoin ETFs had recorded weekly outflows every week since mid-May, culminating in a $1.79 billion withdrawal in the week to June 26, while Ethereum funds also suffered their heaviest redemptions that same week. Separate data cited by the market showed U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs suffered a record $4 billion in net outflows in June, underlining how sharply sentiment had weakened before the latest rebound.
There were early signs of stabilisation at the start of July. Spot Bitcoin ETFs drew $221.72 million on July 2, ending a 10-day run of redemptions before the broader weekly figures turned positive. That improvement coincided with a recovery in bitcoin’s price, helped by comments from Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh that inflation risks had eased and by a weak jobs report that reinforced expectations of softer monetary conditions.
Even so, the comeback remained fragile. Daily flow figures were choppy, with Bitcoin ETFs losing $84.86 million on July 8 and another $95.30 million on July 9 after US strikes on Iran rattled risk assets. President Donald Trump later said the US and Iran had agreed to keep talking, while declaring last month’s ceasefire over, leaving geopolitics as a key swing factor for crypto markets.
The broader picture is still one of volatility after a difficult month for the asset class. In June, both Bitcoin and Ether funds were hit by heavy redemptions, including nearly $200 million in combined outflows on June 23, according to industry figures. For now, the latest inflows suggest investors are tentatively returning, but the durability of that trend may depend on whether macro conditions remain supportive and Middle East tensions do not flare again.
- https://cryptorank.io/news/feed/26195-btcs-hidden-liquidity-cluster-that-will-decide-the-next-move-bitcoin-price-analysis – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://etfgi.com/news/press-releases/2023/08/etfgi-reports-crypto-etfs-and-etps-listed-globally-gathered-net-inflows – In August 2023, ETFGI reported that global crypto ETFs and ETPs attracted net inflows of US$356 million in July, bringing year-to-date net inflows to $598 million. Assets invested in these products increased by 58.4% year-to-date, rising from US$5.79 billion at the end of 2022 to $9.18 billion by July’s end. The ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO US) led with $151.67 million in net new assets during July, contributing significantly to the overall growth in the sector.
- https://coinpaprika.com/news/bitcoin-etfs-record-3966m-outflow-june-3-ibit/ – On June 3, 2026, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs experienced $396.6 million in net outflows, marking their 13th consecutive day of redemptions. BlackRock’s IBIT fund was the primary contributor, accounting for $342.3 million of the total outflows. This trend highlights a significant shift in investor sentiment and the challenges faced by Bitcoin ETFs during that period.
- https://www.coinarticle.com/article/spot-bitcoin-etfs-record-outflow-june – In June 2026, U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a record $4 billion in net outflows, the largest monthly redemption since their January 2024 launch. This marked a reversal from the strong inflows following initial ETF approvals, coinciding with a 5% decline in Bitcoin’s price due to macroeconomic headwinds and regulatory uncertainties.
- https://blockchainreporter.net/bitcoin-etfs-outflow-78m-ethereum-etfs-inflow-107m-on-july-23/ – On July 23, 2024, U.S. exchange-traded funds (ETFs) experienced significant changes in investments for Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH). Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of $78 million, marking the first negative net flow in 13 trading days. In contrast, Ethereum ETFs recorded an inflow of $107 million, indicating a shift in investor preference towards Ethereum during that period.
- https://financefeeds.com/bitcoin-and-ether-etfs-record-nearly-200-million-in-outflows-on-june-23/ – On June 23, 2026, U.S. spot crypto exchange-traded funds recorded nearly $200 million in combined net outflows, with both Bitcoin and Ether products facing redemptions. Despite selective inflows into competing funds, the overall trend indicated a cautious investor sentiment towards crypto ETFs during that period.
- https://www.axios.com/2023/06/15/blackrock-bitcoin-spot-etf-application – On June 15, 2023, BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, filed an application for a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF). This move marked a significant entry into the cryptocurrency space, as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had previously rejected all prior attempts at launching spot Bitcoin ETFs. The application, submitted under the iShares brand, named Coinbase Custody Trust Company as the custodian for the ETF’s Bitcoin holdings, with Bank of New York Mellon managing the cash assets.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
6
Notes:
The article reports on recent inflows into Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, with data up to July 10, 2026. However, similar narratives have appeared in previous years, such as in July 2023, when crypto ETFs and ETPs listed globally gathered net inflows of US$356 million. ([etfgi.com](https://etfgi.com/news/press-releases/2023/08/etfgi-reports-crypto-etfs-and-etps-listed-globally-gathered-net-inflows?utm_source=openai)) This suggests that the current article may be recycling older content. Additionally, the article includes data up to July 10, 2026, but the latest available data from SoSoValue is from July 2023, raising concerns about the freshness and accuracy of the information presented. The inclusion of outdated data further diminishes the article’s freshness score. Given these factors, the freshness score is reduced to 6.
Quotes check
Score:
4
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes attributed to SoSoValue data and comments from Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh. However, no independent verification of these quotes is provided. A search for the earliest known usage of these quotes did not yield any matches, indicating that they cannot be independently verified. The lack of verifiable sources for these quotes raises concerns about their authenticity and accuracy. Therefore, the quotes check score is 4.
Source reliability
Score:
5
Notes:
The article originates from CryptoRank, a niche publication focusing on cryptocurrency news. While it may be reputable within its niche, its reach and influence are limited compared to major news organisations. Additionally, the article appears to summarise or rewrite content from other sources, including press releases and reports from organisations like SoSoValue and the Federal Reserve. This lack of original reporting and reliance on secondary sources diminishes the overall reliability of the article. Given these factors, the source reliability score is 5.
Plausibility check
Score:
6
Notes:
The article discusses recent inflows into Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, attributing the rebound to comments from Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh and geopolitical events. However, the article lacks specific factual anchors, such as names, institutions, and dates, making it difficult to independently verify the claims. The tone and language used are consistent with typical financial reporting, but the lack of detailed supporting information raises questions about the article’s credibility. Therefore, the plausibility check score is 6.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): HIGH
Summary:
The article exhibits significant issues with freshness, source reliability, and verification independence. It recycles older content, relies on unverifiable quotes, and depends heavily on secondary sources with potential biases. These factors collectively undermine the article’s credibility, leading to a FAIL verdict.