Although recent default rates have declined and market sentiment remains fragile, experts highlight underlying vulnerabilities and the potential for sharper stress amid tighter lending conditions and sector-specific challenges.
The private credit market has shown tentative signs of easing but remains under pressure from investor sentiment that some market participants say outstrips underlying performance.
According to Fitch Ratings, the U.S. private credit default rate for the 12 months through February fell to 5.4 percent from 5.8 percent in the 12 months through January, with seven defaults recorded in February spanning health care providers, health care devices, technology software, building and materials, chemicals and business services. Fitch’s broader monitoring of the sector also showed a much larger wave of distress in 2025, when defaults among private-credit borrowers rose to a record 9.2 percent, driven largely by smaller issuers with revenues near $25 million, the agency reported. That 2025 tally identified 38 defaults across 28 borrowers and highlighted the vulnerability of compact capital structures to higher floating rates, even though software companies, despite recent equity turbulence, recorded no defaults in 2025. According to other Fitch reporting, defaults hit 5.8 percent for the 12 months ending January 2026, the highest since August 2024, with health care prominent among recent defaulters.
Yet market sentiment has pushed publicly traded private credit managers sharply lower. Shares of listed private credit management funds have dropped between about 25 percent and 35 percent since September 2025, reflecting investor fears of contagion and wider financial strain. “Sentiment has dramatically amplified the underlying narrative,” Nadeem Kassam, chief investment strategist and chief operating officer at Marnoa Private Wealth Counsel Ltd., told The Epoch Times. Kassam argues that some of the panic is misplaced because exposure to AI and software among private credit portfolios is modest, roughly 6 percent of assets, and that software-linked loans and bonds have moved only modestly compared with a much steeper decline in software equities.
Large-bank and asset-manager analysis largely supports the view that recent price moves have been driven more by perception than by broad loan deterioration. J.P. Morgan Private Bank’s analysis finds non-accruals among publicly traded business development companies remain relatively low at about 2 percent, suggesting that recent defaults have tended to be isolated. The report notes BDC valuations are compressed, trading on average at roughly a 17 percent discount to net asset value, near lows last seen in June 2022, while alternative asset managers trade at about 18 times fee income, a multiple the bank says has in past cycles troughed in the mid-teens.
Institutionalisation and scale within private credit provide further context. The prospectus for BlackRock’s HPS Corporate Lending Fund, produced after BlackRock’s acquisition of HPS Investment Partners, underlines a substantial integrated platform spanning senior and junior credit, asset-based finance and private placements, illustrating how private credit is increasingly run like a mainstream asset class. At the same time, J.P. Morgan’s broader work cautions that while private credit has grown rapidly, it still represents a limited share of total corporate borrowing and, in their view, is unlikely by itself to create systemic turmoil.
But structural risks persist. BDCs typically offer lower interest-coverage cushions than large public borrowers, their EBITDA-to-interest ratios are narrower, implying a smaller margin for error if earnings slip or funding costs remain elevated. Market participants warn that limited liquidity, opaque valuations and the potential for redemption strains amplify the concern. “The sentiment shift is real in that investors are suddenly focusing on opaque valuations, limited liquidity, and redemption caps. More amazingly, it is not appearing out of nowhere. It is being triggered by underlying stresses and jitteriness regarding forecasted underlying stress: weaker borrowers, tighter exit markets, higher-for-longer financing costs, and sector-specific problems, especially in software,” Thomas Young, economist and partner at Econometric Studios, LLC, told The Epoch Times.
Practical signs of tightening are emerging beyond equity prices. JPMorgan Chase has taken markdowns on certain loans linked to private credit funds, particularly those extended to software firms, reflecting heightened caution among bank lenders that finance private credit platforms. Those reassessments, and the possibility of simultaneous draws on available bank commitments, are cited as tail risks; Moody’s has estimated roughly $340 billion of unused bank commitments available to private credit borrowers, a resource that could be stressed in a broad downturn. Kassam notes these bank facilities are typically secured and senior, but says a deep, prolonged recession would be required for widespread actual losses to materialise.
Investors and managers describe the current phase as an adjustment to tighter conditions rather than a collapse. “The market is going back to basics, with cash flow and structure in the spotlight again. We know private markets tend to adjust later because there is less visibility. But when things start to move, they also move quickly,” Arthur Azizov, founder and investor at B2 Ventures, told The Epoch Times. He and others point out that the private-credit expansion followed an extended era of plentiful liquidity and ready refinancing, assumptions now being tested.
In sum, the evidence is mixed. Default metrics have moved down in the most recent month even after a difficult 2025, and metrics such as non-accrual rates for listed BDCs remain modest. However, tighter lender scrutiny, markdowns on software-linked loans, compressed valuations and structural features, smaller interest-coverage cushions and concentrated exposure among smaller issuers, mean the sector is more sensitive to a deterioration in economic conditions or an erosion of liquidity. Market participants and official watchers will be watching borrower cashflows, bank commitment utilisation and any further signs that markdowns among lenders are contagious across the private-credit ecosystem.
- https://www.usnn.news/the-state-of-private-credit-markets-investor-sentiment-versus-fundamentals/ – Please view link – unable to able to access data
- https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/us-private-credit-defaults-hit-record-92-in-2025-fitch-says-4547650 – Fitch Ratings reported that the default rate among U.S. corporate borrowers of private credit rose to a record 9.2% in 2025, up from 8.1% in 2024. The report monitored 302 companies with outstanding private credit debt and identified 38 defaults among 28 different borrowers. Defaults were diversified across various sectors, with smaller issuers, particularly those with earnings of $25 million or less, being the most affected. The findings highlight vulnerabilities in capital structures due to high floating rates, despite no defaults recorded in the software sector last year.
- https://www.idnfinancials.com/news/62007/us-private-credit-default-hits-record-9-2-in-2025-says-fitch – Fitch Ratings reported that loan default rates in the U.S. private credit market reached a new record in 2025, rising to 9.2%, surpassing the previous record of 8.1% in 2024. The report monitored 302 companies with debt in the private credit market and identified 38 default cases among 28 borrowers. Most defaults occurred among smaller companies, particularly issuers with revenues around $25 million or less. Default cases were spread across multiple industries. The findings come amid a sell-off in software sector stocks, which have historically been among the largest borrowers in the private credit market. However, Fitch recorded no defaults in this sector throughout 2025.
- https://www.sahmcapital.com/news/content/us-private-credit-default-rate-highest-since-august-2024-fitch-says-2026-02-24 – Fitch Ratings reported that defaults among U.S. corporate borrowers in the private credit market reached 5.8% for the 12 months ending in January 2026, the highest rate since August 2024. The report recorded 11 defaults in January, nearly double the average of 5.9 monthly defaults in 2025. The healthcare sector led default activity with 13 unique defaulters over the same period. The findings highlight concerns about the impact of AI disruption on companies in the software sector, despite only three unique defaulters in that sector for the 12 months ending in January.
- https://invezz.com/pk/news/2026/03/11/jpmorgan-marks-down-software-linked-private-credit-loans-report/ – JPMorgan Chase has marked down the value of certain loans linked to private credit funds, particularly those issued to software firms, one of the largest borrowing sectors fueling the growth of private credit. This move reflects rising caution among banks that provide financing to private credit funds amid increasing scrutiny from investors and lenders, and fears of potential defaults and weakening valuations, especially among software companies. The markdown applies to loans issued to software firms, indicating a more cautious approach towards this sector.
- https://privatebank.jpmorgan.com/nam/en/insights/markets-and-investing/private-credit-under-the-microscope-separating-headlines-from-fundamentals – J.P. Morgan Private Bank’s report indicates that the recent sell-off in publicly traded private credit funds appears to be driven more by sentiment than by fundamentals. Non-accruals among publicly traded business development companies (BDCs) remain relatively low, averaging around 2%, suggesting that recent defaults are isolated rather than indicative of a systemic issue. The report also highlights that valuations for BDCs appear relatively compressed, with the average stock trading at about a 17% discount to the value of its underlying assets, near lows last seen in June 2022.
- https://www.jpmorgan.com/insights/markets/top-market-takeaways/tmt-private-credit-promising-or-problematic – J.P. Morgan’s analysis suggests that fears of private credit leading to a systemic crisis are overstated. While the industry’s growth is significant, it still represents a smaller portion of corporate borrowing and is not large enough to pose systemic risk. The report also notes that, even factoring in banks’ direct exposure to private debt managers, the risk remains limited and unlikely to trigger a ripple effect that would destabilize the banking system and create systemic risk.
Noah Fact Check Pro
The draft above was created using the information available at the time the story first
emerged. We’ve since applied our fact-checking process to the final narrative, based on the criteria listed
below. The results are intended to help you assess the credibility of the piece and highlight any areas that may
warrant further investigation.
Freshness check
Score:
6
Notes:
The article references data up to February 2026, with some information from 2025. Similar narratives have appeared in The Epoch Times, such as ‘Private Credit Market Rattled as Blue Owl Tightens Investor Liquidity’ (February 2026) and ‘Private Credit Pressures Mount as BlackRock Limits Client Redemptions’ (March 2026). The earliest known publication date of substantially similar content is from February 2026. The article appears to be based on a press release, which typically warrants a higher freshness score. However, the presence of similar content in The Epoch Times raises concerns about originality. The narrative includes updated data but recycles older material, which is a concern. Given these factors, the freshness score is reduced to 6.
Quotes check
Score:
4
Notes:
The article includes direct quotes from Nadeem Kassam, chief investment strategist and chief operating officer at Marnoa Private Wealth Counsel Ltd., and Thomas Young, economist and partner at Econometric Studios, LLC. A search for the earliest known usage of these quotes did not yield any matches, indicating that the quotes cannot be independently verified. Unverifiable quotes should not receive high scores, leading to a score of 4.
Source reliability
Score:
5
Notes:
The narrative originates from The Epoch Times, a publication known for its conservative viewpoints. While it is a major news organisation, it is not as widely recognised as outlets like the BBC or Reuters. The article appears to be summarising or aggregating content from other sources, which raises concerns about source independence. Given these factors, the source reliability score is 5.
Plausibility check
Score:
6
Notes:
The article discusses recent developments in the private credit market, including default rates and investor sentiment. Similar topics have been covered in The Epoch Times, such as ‘Private Credit Market Rattled as Blue Owl Tightens Investor Liquidity’ (February 2026) and ‘Private Credit Pressures Mount as BlackRock Limits Client Redemptions’ (March 2026). The claims made in the article are plausible and align with industry trends. However, the lack of independent verification and the presence of similar content in the same publication raise concerns about the originality and independence of the reporting. Given these factors, the plausibility score is 6.
Overall assessment
Verdict (FAIL, OPEN, PASS): FAIL
Confidence (LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH): MEDIUM
Summary:
The article presents a narrative on the private credit market, referencing data up to February 2026 and including quotes from individuals whose statements cannot be independently verified. The source, The Epoch Times, is a major news organisation but is not as widely recognised as some others, and the article appears to summarise or aggregate content from other sources, raising concerns about source independence. The presence of similar content in the same publication further questions the originality of the reporting. Given these factors, the overall assessment is a FAIL with MEDIUM confidence.

